"The statement pinpoints all the signs of urban corruption found during the investigation of former leaders of the PP: bribery, money laundering, fraud, forgery, embezzlement ... (...)
Morales was "a sad example of what you should never hold public office, that is, use it to make use of it with a strictly private, looking in many cases in a disproportionate benefit particular economic, and in other cases, looking for favorable treatment for their friends, used to achieve these ends all the mechanisms and tools necessary to leave no trace or traces of his duties outside the most basic rules and without the slightest modesty Therefore it directly and, in most cases through on others, both natural and legal, and public and private, which used as proxies as a parapet to hide behind these movements was the person. "
Such management would have been impossible if Morales had not endowed with absolute power: "At least since 2004 centered in his person all the major urban developments in the municipality." (...)
"He kept taking advantage of its status as a public servant with possible influences on the Administration, as a member of Parliamentary Commission of Planning in the Regional Assembly. The prosecution has evidence that the fees requested exceed 15 million euros. result of such operations, Corruption has found that Morales had "a lot of money that far exceeded their earning capacity through official channels, with both an excess of cash movement as a major activity in the procurement of goods movable and immovable, which has failed to justify its legal origin. "
Specifically, the prosecutor handling the case accused the management of more than half a million euros of black money between 2006 and 2007, when all official salaries did not rise to 100,000 euros. " (El País, 08/03 / 2011, p. 16)
0 comments:
Post a Comment